And the Socialists have yet to come up with an Intellectual Response

Look at the shameful way Susan Roesgen “interviews” this man at the Tax Day Tea Party.

She is combative and interrupts him repeatedly. She then proceeds to walk away before he can even respond to her comment. She completely fails to even give the illusion of a fair report, and her combative and interrupting comments makes me think that she wasn’t really even paying attention to the guy. She heard the name Lincoln and starting talking about how the land of Lincoln is getting a bunch of bailout money, completely oblivious to the fact that the point of this whole gathering is to protest the bailouts. She then goes on to say that this protest is highly anti-CNN since it is highly promoted by Fox News. I’m not sure what was going on in here min, but I was at that protest, and I didn’t see one sign talking about CNN. Good thing then next woman took her to task for her very subjective interview and reporting methods.

My old congresswoman Rep. Jan Schakowsky called the protests despicable” and a “shameful political stunt.” Apparently we were all part of a conspiracy and acting on secret orders from businesses, lobbyists and Fox News. Funny, the post office must have misplaced my “Secret Orders.” I’m sorry, but I thought the theft of my wealth through the devaluation of the dollar – which she supports – was much more shameful and despicable.

At least she didn’t go as far as Janeane Garofalo, who called everybody at these protests racists, who are only out there because they cannot stand a black president, and of course they have something wrong with the Limbic System in their brain. She then goes on to say that any non-white people at the protests have Stockholm Syndrome (Stockholm Syndrome being the psychological response where a hostage starts to feel loyalty to the hostage tacker), and that there is a surprising number of people with Stockholm Syndrome.

It is interesting. For the first time in a long time the liberty leaning people of this country have come out in force, and the socialist’s sole reply is name calling. It is very interesting.

Here Comes the Tea Party Pictures!

There were a lot of people there.
long 300x225 Here Comes the Tea Party Pictures!
long2 300x225 Here Comes the Tea Party Pictures!

It was packed in there.

random signs 300x225 Here Comes the Tea Party Pictures!

whytaxes 300x225 Here Comes the Tea Party Pictures!

Here are some of my favorite signs.

At least some people knew that this wasn’t just some Right Wing Socialist/Republican Party conspiracy to undermine Obama. The big-government Republicans suck too.
repub suck 300x225 Here Comes the Tea Party Pictures!

This sign was huge, and explained where your taxes went.

long sign 300x225 Here Comes the Tea Party Pictures!

evil 300x225 Here Comes the Tea Party Pictures!
credit 300x225 Here Comes the Tea Party Pictures!

Tea Party Success!

That was a huge protest. I have not seen one as big since the anti-war protest in 2005. It was far more peaceful too. In that protest, the city, county, and state police filled the whole street in full riot gear, with a line of police on horses in front. Still idiots tried to break the police line. The problem back then is that along with the peaceful liberty loving anti-war protesters there were violent socialists and anarcho-communists groups. Ironic.

Anyway, I digress. Unfortunately, they did not have a stage for the speaker so I could not see the speaker at all, and it was hard to hear what they were saying. In addition, due to the large number of people, I could not easily get to an area where I could see them. There were a lot of libertarian type people. I found some Campaign for Liberty members and a Libertarian party guy. There were also unfortunately some republicans lurking around, forgetting the big government message Bush was all about, but that was to be expected.

All in all it was a success. Unfortunately, I did not bring a proper camera, but I did manage to get some with my mobile. I will post them soon.

Protest Government Theft! Support your local Tax Day Tea Party!

Support your local Tax Day Tea Party. Groups ranging from the libertarian Young American’s for Liberty, to the National Taxpayers Union, to the right wing socialist Young Republicans will be there protesting your money being wasted on stupid government programs. The one in Chicago will be at the Daley Plaza. Although, one of the first e-mail’s I received about this said it was at federal plaza, but I will go and see, they aren’t that far away. Go to the Tax Day Coalition Website to find your local tax day protest.

sam adams at chicago tea party 225x300 Protest Government Theft! Support your local Tax Day Tea Party!

Edit: According to taxdayteaparty.com, it seems that those people that are at Daley Plaza will march over to Kluczynski Federal Plaza at 12:15.

The Obama Betrayal

When Mr. Obama ran for office he claimed he was running for change, he claimed he was running for transparency, he claimed he would be a different kind of president. You would have thought that meant not covering up the crimes that the previous administration committed when it ordered thy National Security Agency to wiretap people’s phones without warrant. According to a recent e-mail I received from the Electronic Freedom Foundation “in a brief filed in EFF’s case, Jewel v. NSA, President Obama argued that the wiretapping program is a “state secret” and that the courts are barred from ever judging its legality. Even worse, they’re arguing that under the PATRIOT Act, the United States government possesses complete “sovereign immunity” against lawsuits for spying that violates federal privacy laws.”

Another e-mail goes on to explain in more detail.

“First, they argued, exactly as the Bush Administration did
on countless occasions, that the state secrets privilege
requires the court to dismiss the issue out of hand. They
asserted that simply allowing the case to continue “would
cause exceptionally grave harm to national security.” As in
the past, this is a blatant ploy to dismiss the litigation
without allowing the courts to consider the evidence.

Second, the DOJ claimed that the U.S. Government is
completely immune from litigation for illegal spying
because the USA PATRIOT Act renders the U.S. immune from
suit under the two remaining key federal surveillance laws:
the Wiretap Act and the Stored Communications Act. This is
a radical assertion that is utterly unprecedented. No one
– not the White House, not the Justice Department, not any
member of Congress, and not the Bush Administration — has
ever interpreted the law this way.”

You are a horrible person, Mr. President. Did that oath of office, to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States mean nothing to you. Does a person’s rights mean absolutely nothing to you. Even your personal website laments Mr. Bush’s use of the “state secrets” tool. I thought, even though I knew you would do your best to completely destroy the economy even more than it already was, you would not actually keep the crimes of the last administration under wraps. I thought that you would try to screw the Republicans as much as possible as is always the case when a new group of idiots takes power.

This isn’t really a surprise, when Obama was in the senate, he voted to give immunity to the telecoms – by dismissing the lawsuits against them – who violated people’s privacy right, and the law, by colluding with the government’s wiretapping. (He voted for it despite me contacting his office and explaining that if he votes for this it the murder of Lady Justice.) It is unfortunate that this country continues to use the idea of sovereign immunity to get away with so many things, whether by using the term sovereign immunity itself, or indirectly such as in this case. Nevertheless, violating the oath of office is considered treason, and in this country, even the president can commit treason.

The Replacement of the Police and the Judicial System

Subscription-Based Patrol and Restitution have developed a business model for Subscription Based Patrol and Restitution. It seems to merely be an academic exercise right now, but who knows what could happen. For a nominal fee, they would patrol the residence with a guaranteed response time (something government based police could never figure out). If a crime does occur, the company investigates, attempts to engage the perpetrator in mediation or arbitration, and if this doesn’t work the company send out a failure to arbitrate to his associates in an attempt to ostracize the perpetrator and it pays out restitution to cover the victims loss. The author of the previous post is involved in this group.

It is very interesting and they have done a lot of research.

Up With Libertarian Entrepreneurship!

by Gil Guillory

There are lots of great ideas for expanding liberty. The most important is probably spreading the ideas of liberty through popular articles, lectures, books, interviews, and formal classes. For these things, we need a professional class of libertarian intellectuals. For those of us who are not quite scholars and who are fed up with politics, but are motivated to do something relevant, entrepreneurship beckons. Entrepreneurship is the peaceful, libertarian version of propaganda by deed. Entrepreneurship is the creative and productive form of direct action.

What is Libertarian Entrepreneurship? It is the creation of new institutions with the goal of advancing the cause of liberty. Examples, tried and untried:

Galt’s Gulch. Once fiction, Werner K. Stiefel tried to make Galt’s Gulch a reality at sea in the 1970’s. The Seasteading Institute is now giving it another shot, following other related efforts, such as The Republic of Minerva and the Principality and Sealand.

The Free State Project operates on the idea of geographically concentrating freedom-lovers in the state of New Hampshire. It was and is one of many libertarian institutions to successfully leverage the power of the internet.

Monetary Entrepreneurship. Re-establishing commodity money – or at least making commodity money possible again – is a tricky problem. Bernard von Nothaus established a warehousing-and-money certificate company in 1998 whose face values mimic those of contemporary US currency. Douglas Jackson and Barry K. Downey founded e-gold in 1996. While e-gold’s effort has been impressive, it still hasn’t broken into the mainstream. The Free Lakota Bank combines secession with monetary entrepreneurship, and is partnered with the AOCS initiative to re-establish silver coinage. Of course, PayPal also began as an effort to create a digital currency.

Adjudication. Arbitration and mediation are thriving business sectors, but quite rare in the area of personal torts. Victim-offender mediation arose through the simple suggestion of a youth probation officer in the early 1970s, and has grown to considerable size, but it is far from ubiquitous and not yet a replacement – as it should be – for criminal proceedings.

Firefighting. In 1667, after the great fire of London, Nicholas Barbon set up a fire insurance business, and in 1680 set up a fire brigade. By the 1700’s, insurance companies in London maintained their own firefighting companies. These institutions passed away for bad reasons.

Crime Insurance and Patrol. My own pet project is subscription patrol and restitution, an attempt to bring restorative justice and accountable patrol to the masses.

Identification. The state crowds out production of personal identification. There is a crying need for good non-state identification methods.

Libertarian Entrepreneurship Society. Maybe there needs to be one. More than one person has mentioned it to me.

Much has been done, but there is also much to do.

Why Entrepreneurship?

As Patrick Tinsley and I noted in our article on Subscription Patrol and Restitution, there are several good reasons to advance libertarianism through entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurs already sculpt the institutions that create social change: Henry Ford and his motorcar, Fred Smith and overnight letter delivery, J. C. Fargo and travelers’ cheques, Akio Morita and the Sony Walkman. Some might fear that being a libertarian first and an entrepreneur second might be bad for business, but Collins and Porras have shown that companies who succeed in creating major social change while trouncing their competition and beating the returns of the general market all share the characteristic of having a core ideology beyond just making money that guides and inspires people throughout an organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time, and that their less successful rivals lack this characteristic. Consumers do not tend to be ideological in their purchases of goods and services: they purchase what works. (This is partially because few people are temperamentally ideological.) But, entrepreneurs are and must be ideological, for they are creating a better way: they must have a vision of the good.

What we libertarians cannot do is “leave to the market” the essential task of sculpting libertarian institutions. The reason that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world is that they are focusing on creating institutions. We have met the market, and the market is us.

So dust off your Napoleon Hill (I recommend this and this), start eating like a bird and pooping like an elephant, and let’s see some hustle out there!

April 10, 2009

Gil Guillory [send him mail] is a libertarian entrepreneur, professional engineer, and project manager in Houston, Texas.

Copyright © 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Useless Currencies of the World Unite!

I’ve been pretty busy, so I’m going to post some very interesting articles.

by The Mogambo Guru

My brain went into some kind of weird spasm when Zhou Xiaochaun, head of the People’s Bank of China, went on record as saying that he doesn’t trust the dollar to be the world’s reserve currency anymore, and wants, instead of gold, the International Monetary Fund to expand the supply of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), which is just another stupid fiat currency, to use as the world’s reserve currency! Gaaahhhh!

I can tell by the way you are not screaming in fear and frantically clawing your way to the nearest exit in a generalized panic that you do not know what a Special Drawing Right is. So prepare to scream and claw when I tell you that – according to the Economist magazine, which I cite as a source since you never believe anything I say – an SDR is “a synthetic currency created by the IMF, whose value is determined as a weighted average of the dollar, euro, yen and pound”!

I deliberately put that exclamation point there at the end so that Junior Mogambo Rangers (JMRs) around the world and across this quadrant of the galaxy would not miss the salient fact that there is something Really, Really Weird (RRW) when these Chinese bastards are smart enough to reject an over-valued fiat dollar, but then being so stupid that they prefer, over gold, a basket of four fiat currencies, one of them being the damned dollar, along with their four corrupt governments, which collectively own the IMF by virtue of having funded the damned thing in the first place! Hahaha! Brilliant! Hahaha!

By this time I was laughing so hard that my stomach started hurting, which made me think that maybe I was hungry, and how maybe a taco would hit the spot right about now, which is Mexican food, as I suddenly suspected Chinese food for making them sound so ridiculous.

Read the rest of the article

The Abuses of TSA and Local Police

I want to congratulate Mr. Steve Bierfeldt for dealing wonderfully with the harassment he sustained from the Transportation Security Administration and the local Police which you can read about here and here. He was on his way home from the Campaign for Liberty Midwest Regional Conference in St. Louis Missouri and was going through the security in the airport when the harassment commenced. He works for the Campaign for Liberty and had a bunch of Campaign for Liberty bumper stickers and a box of about $4,700 in cash and checks from sales of merchandise and tickets. As you know from this post, the state of Missouri thinks that Campaign for Liberty members are a bunch of terrorists.

If you have gone through airport recently, you may know that every once in awhile the TSA decides they need to physically rifle through your bags in order to see if you have any bombs or other weapons. I’m sure they never find any bombs, but they did find this guys box of money. When he refused to metaphorically bend over and take, a TSA agent took him into a windowless room and demanded to know who he worked for and what the money was from. Keeping in mind the Missouri report, he kept asking whether he was required to tell them this information and refusing to tell them information unless they told him that he was required by law to tell them where the money came from.

Of course, he was not required by law to tell the TSA where it came from since cash is not an item that eliminates you from getting on the plane. Whether the agent knew it or he was ignorant of the law (he is TSA after all) the TSA agent brought in police who threatened to take him to a police station and involve the FBI and DEA if he didn’t metaphorically bend over and take it.

Apparently as they were taking him out of the room to bring them to the police station an apparent FBI agent walked up and half asked if the money was campaign contributions and he answered that all the checks say C4L (Campaign for Liberty) and then told Steve he was free to go, which apparently pissed of the TSA officer. He even made his flight.

Have you ever met a nice TSA agent? I have not. They treat you like shit and act like you should know all of the million procedures for going through the line even though there are few if any signs and no people explaining it. God help you if this is your first time. Plus, don’t put anything valuable in your checked baggage because the TSA has the privilege of being able to open any bags they want and things tend to “go missing.”

If I was the military type of person I would salute Mr. Bierfeldt for standing up to these thugs. I can’t honestly say I would have done the same, although after finding out about this incident I hope I would.

Edit. I’m going to include the Fox News video that discuses this event.

My Illinois 5th Vote

I have done it, I have voted for “None of the Above” for the Illinois 5th Congressional Seat. I was thinking about not voting for two reasons. First, the real election was weeks ago during the primary, because who every wins the democratic ticket is basically automatically the winner of the seat. I predict a landslide as usual. The second reason is that all of the people on the ballot were idiots. I even went to the trouble of looking at all of their website, because one of the things I really hate is how people vote the party line no matter what. Out of the three (Democratic Party, Republican Party, and Green Party candidates), I decided that there was a 0.01% chance I would vote for the green party candidate Matt Reichel if on the way to the polling place I was hit by a car and the only things I could remember is that I was going to vote for the 5th congressional district seat and Matt Reichal said that president Bush should have been impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors. Other than that, they are all a bunch of idiots who would only make this world a worse place.

Also, I hate when people say that you can’t complain if you don’t vote. If the candidacy is between a giant douche and a turd sandwich, or between a steel chain or a carbon allow chain of slavery, you can choose to not choose.

Anyway, I would not have voted, but I was reading the Probability Broach by L. Niel Smith (a wondering fiction and non-fiction writer and co-founder of the Libertarian Enterprise) the other day. This book is about a cop living in this world who is thrown into a parallel universe which is basically a libertarian utopia ever since George Washington failed to put down the Whiskey Rebellion in that reality. In that alternative world there is always an option for “none of the above” if you can’t stand the idiocy of any of the candidates, because who “will die if there is no president?”

So, I thought that this would be fun, and a small protest against the usual suspects that appear on the ballot.